COVET: bluetooth virtual keyboard


Bluetooth Laser Virtual Keyboard

Lasers? And Virtuals? And Bluetooth?

Only problem is, where do you stick it? Hmm, how about your own chest?

~ by Skennedy on April 18, 2006.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tags: ,

36 Responses to “COVET: bluetooth virtual keyboard”

  1. so damn cool..

    but wouldnt it be better on someone else’s chest?

    disarray2 said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:44 pm

  2. so damn cool..

    but wouldnt it be better on someone else’s chest?

    disarray2 said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:44 pm

  3. Wow. I want. Now.

    It’d go perfectly with my new iMac. ;)

    incyr said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:52 pm

  4. Wow. I want. Now.

    It’d go perfectly with my new iMac. ;)

    incyr said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:52 pm

  5. I’m still waiting (and waiting) for the Optiums keyboard.

    urthstripe321 said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:54 pm

  6. I’m still waiting (and waiting) for the Optiums keyboard.

    urthstripe321 said this on April 18, 2006 at 8:54 pm

  7. I’d gladly type on your chest.

    :blush: I mean – this keyboard.

    silver_bits said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:14 pm

  8. I’d gladly type on your chest.

    :blush: I mean – this keyboard.

    silver_bits said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:14 pm

  9. I like the fact that it’s red…I hate light pollution. :P Really though, it’s not nearly as hard on one’s eyes as plain white(ish) light is.

    aa_ron said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:17 pm

  10. I like the fact that it’s red…I hate light pollution. :P Really though, it’s not nearly as hard on one’s eyes as plain white(ish) light is.

    aa_ron said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:17 pm

  11. I myself am technolusting after that gadget… especially with my existing case of technolust over the Origami computers.

    Tactile keyboards? We don’t need no stinkin’ tactile keyboards!

    — Steve is considering shaving about $50 USD off and getting the Stowaway physical model… but the VDK does tempt, the little vamp.

    anton_p_nym said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:25 pm

  12. I myself am technolusting after that gadget… especially with my existing case of technolust over the Origami computers.

    Tactile keyboards? We don’t need no stinkin’ tactile keyboards!

    — Steve is considering shaving about $50 USD off and getting the Stowaway physical model… but the VDK does tempt, the little vamp.

    anton_p_nym said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:25 pm

  13. mmmmmmm gadgetry!

    so many places to stick it, really. why just limit yourself to a chest?

    hannunvaakuna said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:47 pm

  14. mmmmmmm gadgetry!

    so many places to stick it, really. why just limit yourself to a chest?

    hannunvaakuna said this on April 18, 2006 at 9:47 pm

  15. And I thought it was amusing when people typed notes to themselves in my chat window. I shouldn’t tell him about this, or he’ll be taking notes on me…

    wait, maybe that’s a good idea. hmmmm

    perfect_autumn said this on April 18, 2006 at 11:06 pm

  16. And I thought it was amusing when people typed notes to themselves in my chat window. I shouldn’t tell him about this, or he’ll be taking notes on me…

    wait, maybe that’s a good idea. hmmmm

    perfect_autumn said this on April 18, 2006 at 11:06 pm

  17. So, the key I’m trying to press will actually appear somewhere on the back of my hand? Gets my vote for cool, but unusable.

    clayfoot said this on April 19, 2006 at 1:13 am

    • I imagine it won’t sell very well if it is unusable.

      atdt1991 said this on April 19, 2006 at 3:44 am

      • *eye roll* If only that were true. Coolness and other features (like Bluetooth) go so far toward selling gadgets. Many mobile phones get terrible marks for their keypad layouts or menu function access, but they still sell like hotcakes.

        clayfoot said this on April 19, 2006 at 11:08 am

        • Don’t remind me of my own troubles with the RAZR.

          Still, The sort of trouble we’re talking about here is literally the -very- first thing that comes to mind with this device. I’ve not been disappointed yet by any of my thinkgeek purchases – they seem like folks who try the gadgets out before they sell them. Maybe I’ve fallen for their marketing, but I’d be reasonably confident of it doing what it advertised. No, I don’t intend to find out, in this instance. :)

          atdt1991 said this on April 19, 2006 at 1:43 pm

        • Don’t remind me of my own troubles with the RAZR.

          Still, The sort of trouble we’re talking about here is literally the -very- first thing that comes to mind with this device. I’ve not been disappointed yet by any of my thinkgeek purchases – they seem like folks who try the gadgets out before they sell them. Maybe I’ve fallen for their marketing, but I’d be reasonably confident of it doing what it advertised. No, I don’t intend to find out, in this instance. :)

          atdt1991 said this on April 19, 2006 at 1:43 pm

      • *eye roll* If only that were true. Coolness and other features (like Bluetooth) go so far toward selling gadgets. Many mobile phones get terrible marks for their keypad layouts or menu function access, but they still sell like hotcakes.

        clayfoot said this on April 19, 2006 at 11:08 am

    • I imagine it won’t sell very well if it is unusable.

      atdt1991 said this on April 19, 2006 at 3:44 am

  18. So, the key I’m trying to press will actually appear somewhere on the back of my hand? Gets my vote for cool, but unusable.

    clayfoot said this on April 19, 2006 at 1:13 am

  19. Damn, makes me wanna go out and get a PDA. That would be sadly humorous though, if you tried to type on the keyboard and it projected onto the back of your hand lol. I wonder how they get past that quirk.

    lordrenob said this on April 19, 2006 at 3:57 am

  20. Damn, makes me wanna go out and get a PDA. That would be sadly humorous though, if you tried to type on the keyboard and it projected onto the back of your hand lol. I wonder how they get past that quirk.

    lordrenob said this on April 19, 2006 at 3:57 am

  21. !! that’s great!

    t0astbandit said this on April 19, 2006 at 7:25 am

  22. !! that’s great!

    t0astbandit said this on April 19, 2006 at 7:25 am

Comments are closed.