An interesting pair of (somewhat but not entirely related) articles:

U.S. Government to Ban Sale of Clove, Flavored Cigarettes

Bans on smoking in public places have had a bigger impact on preventing heart attacks than ever expected, data shows

~ by Skennedy on September 22, 2009.

6 Responses to “An interesting pair of (somewhat but not entirely related) articles:”

  1. The ban on cloves really cheeses me off. They weren’t marketed to minors and minors didn’t smoke them. They were too expensive and you had to go to an actual tobacco store to get them, kids just get cheap cigs at the gas station.

    Abby quit smoking, but we both still enjoyed an occasional clove on the weekend with a beer or cup of coffee. Overall I like our president and I want healthcare reform, but this just smacks of overzealous “think of the children!” nanny-state-ism.

    • I agree that “flavored cigarettes” in general did not seem to be marketed to children, cloves included. I -will- say that in my days at the local Goth club as a teen, smoking cloves was the thing to do.

      I never did, because my mom was such an intense smoker; I never wanted to get into the habit, like my best friend, who went from occasionally smoking to a pack a day.

      I’ve talked about the public smoking ban with a number of prople, and a lot of us are in agreement: We would never actually vote for such a law, but we would be relieved if one were to exist in Michigan (one’s been in the works for a few years).

      On a personal liberty level, it stinks, but in a quality-of-life sense (especially as someone with asthma), it really makes things better for me.

      (Note that I’m not saying one trumps the other.)

Comments are closed.